E05European refugees between South Asia, the Middle East and Europe

Self- and External Categorisations in Contested Spaces of the 20th Century

During the 1930s and the early 1940s, more than 1.5 million people fled Europe to escape persecution and World War II.

“Where shall we go from here?” – European Crossroads, Daily Express, 1938. © Alamy Pictures

They sought protection, assistance and public recognition in a variety of locations – including territories under British colonial rule, such as the British Mandates in the Middle East and British India.

After 1947/48, some remained in the newly formed states of India, Pakistan and Israel, while others returned to Europe (particularly Britain, East and West Germany) or migrated elsewhere.

Lea Grundig, View of the Port of Haifa from the refugee ship “Patria,” 1940, Quill, Ink, 26.8 x 35.7 cm, Academy of Arts, Berlin, Art Collection, Inventory No.: Lea Grundig 2448 © VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2026
  • How did individuals negotiate their status while seeking refuge in the Middle East or South Asia?
  • How did European refugees position themselves vis-à-vis conflicts in the Middle East, South Asia and Europe?
  • How did colonial and postcolonial contexts shape the transfer of human categories (e.g. “European refugee”, “Sh’erit ha-Pletah”, “emigrant”, “victim of fascism”)?
Paul Arnsberg Gedenkstele, Paul-Arnsberg-Platz, Frankfurt am Main, 2026. © Julia Bezold
Ellen Auerbach, Reisepass Nr. 192R./643/33, ausgestellt am 13. Juli 1933, gültig bis 12. Juli 1938 © Akademie der Künste, Berlin, Ellen-Auerbach-Archiv, Signatur: Auerbach 277
Charles Petras, Behind Barbed Wire, in: Man Athirst, Dehradun um 1940, Hilde Holger Archive © 2001 Primavera Boman-Behram. All Rights Reserved.

By analysing the biographies of European refugees, the project offers new insights into the contested relationship between the Nazi regime in occupied Europe and colonial rule in South Asia and the Middle East. It highlights the diverse forms of agency exercised by individuals who were forcibly mobile within shifting colonial and postcolonial contexts. Beyond tracing the global transfer of categories used to differentiate people, we examine local specificities in the categorisation of individuals amid religious and economic conflicts surrounding the partition and redistribution of land, movable property and populations. In doing so, this research contributes to a European social history “from below”.